

Words are nothing. They do not represent reality. They are noises that have been ascribed meaning. And then over the years, judgment and value have been placed on words. The idea that some words are unspeakable or some ideas are hate, chills me to the bone. i can, and will, always say what I want, what I think, what I see. Any laws around speech in America are related to intent, not words said. You cannot prove intent. We do not live in the minority report. It is a violation of our human born freedoms to criminalize the interpretations of someones pre emptive actions. Until the crime is commited, there is no way to be sure the perpetrator would have gone through with it. If you can arrest someonbe for intent, then arrest every single human. Intent isnt action. Words are intent, or action. Words are sounds. Action is action. And no law should be in the business of mind reading.
I have never let anyones words inside me. When I was first bullied at age 9, my Mom told me to just ignore it. Don’t let it affect me. They are just jealous, intimidated, feel bad about them selves. Just cause someone says something, does not mean it is true. So I never internalised anything anyone ever said to me after that. Not even what my parents thought. I hate to be influenced by any one elses words. Why should someones words affect the action I want to take? I think things through and know what feels right for me. If I let someones words change my perspective on reality then I am further from experiencing reality as myself. This is how most people end up regreting things. Do not regret the things you have done but those you did not do. People who regret things they have done, did them cause of someone elses influence. People who don’t do things, do so cause of someone elses influence. The only reason to regret something is if you weren’t doing what you wanted. But this is how most people live. It is incomprehensible to me.
If someone calls me a fat bitch, I don’t suddenly worry that I am in fact fat, and am intentionally mean to people. No, I know myself. Insult the work I do. Cool. That is your opinion. I don’t feel bad about myself cause you feel bad about yourself. How would I let someone who doesn’t understand me or know me or lived as me, tell me who I am?! If someone said I shouldn’t live in a bus, I would have anyway as I had figured it out. I know they haven’t thought about it in the way I have and have no idea of my capabilities. They are projecting their own fears.
You cannot incite violence. You can only comit it. If you say “go murder dave”, no one has to acknowledge you. No one has to act on it. The person acting on it, decided to mind read, assume you meant it, and act on it, ie “wont someone rid me of this meddlesome preist”. “Go riot”. Well you don’t have to. If you take someones words as a command, then that is on you. Do you not have a brain? Do you not have the ability to say no, to walk away, to resist? Its not hard.
Hate speech isn’t real. You are implying you can mind read. “I want to murder all gays.” I can say that. It doesn’t mean anything. It is a string of words. If you, as a gay, take that statement as a threat, that is cause of your insecurity and believe that you are a persecuted victim. You have NO idea what I ACTUALLY think about gays. I just said words. Words are not a reflection of my thinking. I could say “I want to eat all the gays.” It is meaningless. My words are not a reflection of my intent or opinion. I actually don’t really like “the gays” any more, and I can say that, cause its my opinion. If MY opinion offends you, then you have a unaddressed issues. I know people hate me cause of my work. I know I could be accused of being “a mentally ill, privilidged, nasty, slut, prostitutue trash whore, retard, homophobic, racist, who can’t survive doing anything else apart from getting her clothes off. She is a lonely, bitter old cat lady.” Oh right, I am am I? That is what you think, but I know myself and don’t see myself this way. You can put your perspective onto my reality, but your perspective cannot change what I understand and have experienced in reality. Also, the statement is correct, it is just using brutal language. To many people, being a sex worker and a promiscuous woman, is disgusting. Privilidge tho, is that an insult? Not to me. Same for any word. It is only an insult if you take it that way. You can observe the judgement the speaker is putting into the word, but the actual word has no power or meaning. Racist, ok, so what? I know what I think. I know how I treat real people outside of conceptual work. I don’t think having thoughts about a races culture or stereotypes makes me a bad person or racist. If you think it does, so what? We won’t know each other. I don’t care. And you should not care that I exist, thinking dangerous thoughts. Unless someone has actual power to change laws, rules, or norms then they are not a threat. Individuals opinions are not ideologies. Ideologies are dangerous. Opinions are not. And if you think my bad opinion is dangerous, then thank you, you think I am as powerful as I do!
I saw a video of a guy standing with a sign that was meant to provoke. Something about women. Now, if I saw him, I would have said to myself, oh here is someone looking to provoke. Why would I give someone like that what they want? Are you that much of dumb simple puppet that you have to walk up and react exactly as he wanted? No one need interupt their day and peace to go attack this man for his opinion. That is their choice. The mature, enlightened, human thing to do, is to look away, walk away, do not engage. But in that video, many people walked up and would not give up. He clearly was being cheeky and yet these people felt it was their right and place to attack him and try to change his mind. It looked so pathetic. Those people want trouble. They want to feel bad, they want to feel attacked, a victim, standing up for a cause. But it was just one bloke with a sign. He won’t be changing any laws, any rules, any social or cultural standards. But many people felt threatened enough by one mans words, they had to engage. You engaging, IS the negative effect in the world. You getting upset and hurt by someones words is the only harm words can cause. And that is on you for lacking emotional resilience. If you don’t let someones words affect you, then words are harmless and meaning less!
So many people are lead by their lizard brain, they are calling out for censorship. They do not acknowledge any agency. They are puppets, blown about in the wind by other peoples words. Its truly pathetic. How about instead of censoring, making hate speech and suggesting some words or phrases are criminal, we teach people to elevate themselves above it. Words are NOT reality. Each person is 100% responsible for their experience of the world. I cannot and do not wish to control anything anyone thinks. Its facinating learning why people think the ways they do. I have had drinks with murderers, gangsters, pimps, prostitutes, drug dealers, pedo killers, old boys, ghetto boys, narc women, narc men, gamblers, racists, people with a myriad of “hateful” opinions. Not once did it affect me. I heard their stories. I observed them as their whole. Their perspective on the world adds to my understanding of reality, but it can’t change my experience of reality. I do not let words cloud reality, especially other peoples. Teach people resilience and self belief. Teach them to realize opinions are as common as assholes and we are all born with them and a right to express them, as we have a right to shit. We don’t have to handle others excrement, and other people shitting, doesn’t change how you shit. Same with words.
Sex on a Cycle? | Psychology Today
So where does this leave us?
Studies of the relationship between sexual desire, coitus and menstrual cycles in women have yielded variable results. This is only to be expected, as multiple confounding factors are involved, including initiation of sexual activity by one or other partner, a rebound effect following abstinence during menstruation, and use of oral contraceptives. Some studies have reported a peak in sexual motivation and/or actual coitus approximately coinciding with mid-cycle and hence with the likelihood of ovulation. But most studies have failed to identify a clear mid-cycle peak. The underlying assumption has been that hormonal changes over the cycle may influence sexual motivation. However, most studies did not include hormonal monitoring, so ovulation time has often been only approximately inferred. Overall, it is possible to recognize a general trend across many studies in which female sexual motivation shows a peak in the week following cessation of menstruation (days 8-14). In addition, a secondary peak often occurs during the week preceding the next menstruation (days 22-28 in a four-week cycle).
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/03/hormones
āIn humans, signs of sexual interest arenāt nearly so obviousā¦.
But according to a steady stream of new studies by evolutionary and biological psychologists, that may not be the case. This research indicates that the hormonal changes of a womanās monthly cycle may be more powerful than weāve ever conceived ā compelling women to advertise when theyāre ovulating, and men to notice. Although women arenāt showing off swellings, yowling or spraying, studies suggest they may dress more provocatively, flirt more, and possibly become more sexually excitable, for roughly six days mid-cycle, before and after ovulation. They even show minuscule shifts in voice pitch, scent and skin tone, some studies suggest.
These changes are not lost on men, whose own hormones and mating behaviour respond to a womanās cues, as well as how the woman treats them, says Jon Maner, PhD, a hormone researcher and associate professor of psychology at Florida State University. To illustrate: In one of his studies, men actually inched closer to a woman ā and mimicked her gestures more ā when she was ovulating.ā
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140214130907.htm
āOne hypothesis for why a mate preference shift occurs is that it may be an evolutionary adaptation that served our ancestors’ reproductive interests long before modern medicine, nutrition and sanitation dramatically reduced infant and child mortality rates.
“Under this hypothesis, women who preferred these characteristics were more likely to pass on beneficial genetic qualities to their children, thereby enhancing their children’s chances of survival and reproductive success,” Gildersleeve said.
In her past work, Haselton also has proposed the hypothesis that being torn between two types of mates may reflect powerful underlying adaptations. According to this “dual mating hypothesis,” in certain circumstances, ancestral women would have been driven to pursue kindness, reliability and resources (so-called “good dad” traits), as well as sex appeal and a masculine personality (“sexy cad” traits), even if both sets of qualities didn’t come in the same package.
“Ancestral women would have benefited reproductively from selecting partners with characteristics indicating that they’d be good co-parents, such as being kind, as well as characteristics indicating that they possessed high genetic quality such as having masculine faces and bodies,” Haselton said. “Women could have had the best of both worlds — securing paternal investment from a long-term mate and high-genetic quality from affair partners — but only if those affairs were timed at a point of high fertility within the cycle, and probably only if their affairs remained undiscovered.”
A different hypothesis, which Haselton and Gildersleeve also find plausible, proposes that shifts in women’s mate preferences across the menstrual cycle were adaptive in a now-extinct species that predated humans and are vestigial in humans — that is, like the coccyx, or tailbone, that remains at the end of the human spine, they persist in modern humans despite serving no apparent function.
Either way, Haselton and Gildersleeve firmly believe in the value of shedding light on the preference shift.
“If women understand the logic behind these shifts, it might better inform their sexual decision-making so that if they notice suddenly that they’re attracted to the guy in the next cubicle at work, it doesn’t necessarily mean that they don’t have a great long-term partner,” Haselton said. “They’re just experiencing a fleeting echo from the past.”ā
1 | Period | Stodgy and fat. Sore. Avoid. | |
2 | Period | Getting horny randomly. | |
3 | Period | Want penetration even though it’s gross. | |
4 | Period | Feral freedom. | |
5 | Period | Blank and simple | |
6 | Mid Follicular | Direct and practical. | |
7 | Mid Follicular | Direct and practical. | |
8 | Mid Follicular | Direct and practical. | |
9 | Late Follicular | Flirty and light. Easy to arousal. | |
10 | Late Follicular | Flirty and light. Easy to arousal. | |
11 | Late Follicular | Sensual and light. Easy to arousal, penetration. | |
12 | Late Follicular | Sensual and light. Easy to arousal, penetration. | |
13 | Late Follicular | Sensual and light. Easy to arousal, penetration. | |
14 | Ovulation | Aggressively horny. Gangbangs. | |
15 | Early Luteal | ||
16 | Early Luteal | ||
17 | Early Luteal | Blank and simple | |
18 | Early Luteal | Blank and simple | |
19 | Early Luteal | Blank and simple | |
20 | Early Luteal | Blank and simple | |
21 | Mid Luteal | Irritable but physical. Active. Dynamic | |
22 | Mid Luteal | Irritable but physical. Active. Dynamic | |
23 | Mid Luteal | Irritable but physical. Active. Dynamic | |
24 | Mid Luteal | Irritable but physical. Active. Dynamic | |
25 | Late Luteal | Angry and feisty. Not active | |
26 | Late Luteal | Lonely and angsty. | |
27 | Late Luteal | Lonely and emotional | |
28 | Late Luteal | Bloated and unsexy. |
No touch, anticipation, close but cool. Non directional tension. Feeling the heat of the body. The little hairs brushing.The build up of erogenous stimulation not released. The tease and anticipation can fuel your mood. The satisfaction of restraint.
A comforting medium touch. Smooth, predictable, safe. A loving yet practical presence. Shoulder massage, hugs, skin on skin. But not sexual. No erogenous zones being touched. Pleasure is in the physicality of your partner and the physical care of the other’s body. Pleasure is in the comfort and safety in the familiar. The closeness and intimacy of your best friend. The satisfaction is knowing you have a physical partner beyond the sexual function of your body.
Kissing. Just make out. Kissing doesnāt have to lead to anything. When you know it’s the end in itself you can drop into the enjoyment of the turn on. The heat. The passion. The desire. The ache.
Dry humping. Really the same as above. It’s so good. Everyone can cum from it. It actually feels naughty.
Making love. The slow, sensual, present indulgence in each other’s bodies. Pursuing connection. Pleasure from Penis in Vagina. The woman defines the positions that give her a feeling of connection that will enable orgasm. The pace is female. Breathe together. Touch and explore together. Do not make assumptions about what love feels like to your partner that day.
A quickie. When you are both feeling fun and light. When pleasure through orgasm isn’t the goal. The goal is the pleasure of a stolen moment. The satisfaction of scratching an itch. It’s quite the male pace and positioning.
Fucking. Raw, passionate, hot, horny. More traditional build up via direct action on erogenous zones, escalating the heat at a steady pace. Hyper objectification of the self and other. Aesthetic positions. A desire to impress. A mutual pace and positioning. Woman revelling in her openness. Man free to indulge his more animal nature.
Curious exploration. A playful intent. The woman could recline while the man is free to adventure over the landscape of her body. From the tips of her toes to the top of her head. A sensuous discovery of soft skin and sensitive spots. Trying out different touch. Communicating playfully, sharing pleasure. Learning to feel comfortable being exposed, open and sexual. This could be performed the other way around after. You can pay attention to how your partner explores you. It is often an indicator of what they like to receive. Orgasm and direct and repetitive erogenous stimulation is not the goal. The satisfaction is in the sense of shared intimacy.
Erogenous exploration. Similar to above but focused on sexual stimulation. What pleasure can you give or receive with your hands, mouth and body, without penetration.
Soaking. Do it like a mormon. You donāt need to be pumped at or to be pumping your dick. Let the lady learn how to give and receive pleasure in a different direction. Both could learn and practise enhanced muscle control. It can be very intimate, deep and emotional for a woman to allow this level of relaxation during penetration.
Full body massage. Lotion. Talc. Skin on skin. Use hands and arms. Intentional exploration of easing stress. Massage can be given and received without need for penetration. Without it being sexual.
Full body massage. Oil. Skin on skin. Use the body and hands. It could be a deeply sexual experience. The full body oil massage is incredibly sexual and penetration is part of it. Functional and sensual. Firm but not rough. Squeeze. Feel your animal body against each other.
Naked kissing and dry humping, but no penetration. Orgasm could happen. But it’s not the goal.
Performative sex. The male or the female takes the lead. And peacocks. Be a sexual animal. Show off what you enjoy. Spoil your partner. Pleasure and satisfaction is the goal. It generally feels better if the person performing is lost in your body. They arenāt trying to do what pleases you, they are enjoying being an animal with your body.
Feral. Get high off each other’s smells, tastes and sensations. Enjoy natural pheromones on each other’s bodies. Put your face in unusual places. Feet, armpits, butt. The weird stuff about your bodies. Silly. Vocal. Rub erogenous zones in unusual places.
Just the tip. Who can last the longest? The tip canāt pop inside the entrance. It’s nice if she can be on top and control the situation. She can lie on him in a way that stimulates the clitoris while the tip teases the entrance. You can give in or get off like that! It is nice to feel the fullness after the teases. But sometimes, the tease, knowing you canāt let it inside, is way more erotic, and orgasmic!
Just sitting next to each other. Sit close enough to touch. Feel the intimacy and connection without the need for more. Chatting, watching TV, or the kids. Lean on each other.
Firmly rubbing, holding, hugging or squeezing each other over clothes. Comfort.
Fluids. If either person is not comfortable with their own or their partners fluids, feel free to fix that. One cannot be comfortable in open intimacy if one is scared of the physical reality of our bodies. Female discharge changes. A healthy diet and body makes everything taste better, and you are more confident. Same for smells. Donāt like it? Fix it. If you still have an aversion, learn to get comfortable with it, its reality.
Sausage in a bun! Penetration not an option? Bleeding or ovulating? Let him slide it between your thighs or butt cheeks, if you enjoy it! It can be fun, and it’s only lame if you have a man who is only happy in life when his dick is wet! Enjoy what you can do, not lament what you canāt.
By having set rules or understanding of intimate acts and where they lead, can free up women to indulge in their natural cyclical sexuality. The man can know what to expect and he can learn and practice experiencing different types of sexual pleasure outside the penis. It is also the perfect training ground for a man’s temperament. A real man is a man who could be a monster, but chooses not to be. Someone with some self restraint. That is manly and sexy. Constantly needing to pound your pole or expecting every touch to end to you getting to fuck her pussy and cum like youre wanking, is not manly. It’s my biggest turn off. But it is also all I have experienced.
Gang bang. Canāt leave out my favourite. If you look at the studies into female sexuality and the hormone cycle, you will see over and over that women are attracted to two different types of males. A partner, provider and protector. And also the alpha, manly, aggressive male. The need for the men with good genes peaks around ovulation. Not at all a coincidence. One man suggests the women sneak about and only succeed if they don;t get caught by a long term partner. I posit that when we were animals, when we were natural and nomadic, when we werenāt ruled as a mass, women were allowed to be hyper sexual. If the natural biology of males leads to a spectrum of masculinity, there will be males who never have a lifetime mate, but who have the best genes. How would these genes get passed on and the child survive into adulthood if there werenāt men around as partners or carers/fathers. When there was no property to pass from father to son and the number one drive of the human species was to reproduce and survive, there would have been no reason for paternal lineage to be protected. They also posit that human females do not show ovulation like other female animals. I tend to disagree. Again that is due to milenia of the shaming of the female. Its from women needing to hide their sexuality in a western society/ modern world, due to the risk of rape, murder or pregnancy, as the traditional community structures crumbled and women became ever more dangerous. Women are so dangerous these days, only men can be women! And real women cant exist any more. Women cannot speak, they cannot gather, women cannot organise or protect their boundaries. Woman has been erased from the highest of dictionaries. The revolution will be the freeing of the REAL female cyclical, sensual, body enlightenment. The female body will connect us back to reality and nature. That is why we are so dangerous. The transhuman globalists know this. They want you all to see yourselves as a brain in a meat sack, so when you are in your pod, you don;t care you have nothing, do nothing and will ever be anything, cause you’re living body free in the metaverse.
To keep the species and the tribe strongest, it would have been essential for as many females to mate with as many high value males as possible on her day of ovulation. A woman is more confident, has more testosterone, your voice gets higher, your skin is plump, you are leaner, and your pussy feels like a throbbing cock between your legs all day. When there was no shame in the female body and reality she could have engaged a man or a group of men in impregnating her. Male testosterone peaks in the autumn and luls in the spring. Sounds a lot like a safe natural rhythm for human reproduction. Impregnate in the Autumn, birth in Spring.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140214130907.htm
https://www.apa.org/monitor/2011/03/hormones
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/how-we-do-it/201803/sex-cycle
In most cases family is better for a child than the state. Many feminists on the left see the state as a benevolent parent, I do not. Why would anyone give their child to be guided by the state? Why is asking questions about that so enraging for these busy āfeministsā? https://twitter.com/ThePosieParker/status/1633799220200108034
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN š šš¤šš¦š¦š on Twitter: “A thread in response to Jordan Gray’s piece in @Independent for #IWD2023. Let’s just unpick some of Jordan’s philosophical musings on what a woman is 1/19 #IWD2023 #IWD23” / Twitter
ā Read on twitter.com/HighwaterEllen/status/1633482374775205888
This Confused Girl Says āLikeā 1 Million Times…but Sheās Not Wrong https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aK2Txz1PoaA
If I don’t have a penis or strip am I still a woman? #BillyBragg #KJintheUSA #letwomenspeak #st⦠https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-0maHrub7w
10% actually planned to not have children.
— Chris Williamson (@ChrisWillx) February 4, 2023
Which leaves a whopping 80% of non-mothers who are childless due to life circumstances but wanted children ā the most common reason being that they didnāt find the right partner early enough.
Source: Professor Renske Keiser
This is just more proof for me as to why I don’t get on with most people. Most women. I am so different from the majority in all major factors, so add them all up and I really am rare in my perspective and experience on this planet. In terms of women who think the same as me re children, I am the same as the 10% of women who don;t want children who havent had them. Most women who haven’t had them, want them. I cannot comprehend. Out of the happy childless women, how many are age appropriate as a friend, how many are sex workers, how many are artists aswell, how many are loners, how many live in the wilderness? I would imagine HC women will have similar interests or ways of life cause of all the reasons they are HC will affect what interest we have. But finding each other in the same place, at the same time, who are able to interact and WANT to know anyone, I don;t. So when women don’t get me, don;t like me, think I’m hard or mean, they need to realize they are basically a different species. I am not the same as you. I cannot imagine wanting to care full time for other people. I am too important to be the last thing on my priority list. I would not want to believe that what I do bringing up a child wont have a impact on them and the world in a negative way for the rest of their lives. I can’t imagine not being able to say no ever again. I cannot imagine the heartbreak of your baby becoming a teenager and suddenly hating you. The pain and the trauma and the drama and the immersion in the daily minutia of other peoples perspective. Exhausting. Just doing that for me is hard enough. I feel like I’m managing a whole team or system of people just to keep me going. I freeze over every major decision as I am so aware of the potential consequensene I get decision paralazyz, I cannot imagine how hard it would be making decisions that will mold how another human experiences the world. The fact we just let anybody pop one out and do that blows my mind. No child has the right to a good upbringing in this world. And it shocks the shit out of me. We know the devestating consequences of bad parenting and even the huge and often devestating effect of absent parents or even “good” parents who have imparted bad ideas/unhealthy coping mechanisms, or didn’t teach their child how to cope as life was too good, can have. Yet nothing is being done to stop it. There should be standards to be met and specific knowledge, skills and understandings that should be universally applied. But hey, I don;t have to worry about it. I just have to live in a world where the consequencess of all the varieties of parenting are inflicted on me to the extent I can no longer cope with it and have become a hermit. I like people. I hate how they have been raised, domesticated and parented. So it does affect me and I do have a right to care about what all these women who aren’t like me, are doing to their children. I don;t like their minds. But I’m the odd one out who has to suffer their inadequasies and insecurities. Bad Mothers are real and its time to start exploring how far reaching the effect and conesequences of it are.
Im trying to adjust my pace to reality. Slow down. No immediate news, updates, other people. Just me. My thoughts. Me enjoying reality as it is, not just feeling good cause Iām isolating and controlling. Always remembering the bigger picture. The chance of being alive for this moment in infinity. 90s pace. Cause I fucking love tv. But books. And music. Stay in my body. Write what I know deeply. No need to be responding to the stuff that is intentionally spread to diss tract and control.
We live in a time of informational super abundance. But the throttle is in the āegoā, your perspective, yourself, getting in the way. You think the structure of information you have consumed from birth is reality. You only hold shape as a person in relation to it. But that is not true. You exist as a conscious entity outside of programming. You can unlearn your perspective. You can realize someone who has been given the exact opposite information to you, is a good, kind, happy, whole person who is valid in their perspective. Once you get it, then all of a sudden, it floods in. You realize, everyone is valid in their own perspective. That means there are billions of perspectives on reality all operating at once. No one perspective is right, no other is wrong, they just all are. In that space of acceptance, outside of perspective, is reality. Let the wall of knowledge blast your perspective right out your head.
Open yourself up to the infinite stream of information. Let it flow over you, overwhelm you, drown you, until you are no more. Let yourself hear every dialectic so you can elevate above it. Once you stop trying to see the world from your perspective, you edge closer to reality. The internet provides access to pretty much every bit of information and knowledge we have as a species, that hasnāt been lost to time or agenda. Itās all there. And no one is stopping anyone from finding out whatever they want. You can learn, see, hear or understand anything. You can get a degree and change your life. You can become enlightened. You can become an expert in any field. You can find someone who feels like you but also someone who thinks the total opposite. You can use this wealth of information to step into the void. Once you start seeing a wealth of perspectives and information, new or different to you, as valid, possible, real, you start to loosen your attachment to your perspective. If you are able to be surrounded by all the dialectics of life, you can step into the eye of the storm. And, there is nothing there. You just are. You can see everything as it is. Nothing is true or false, right or wrong. Itās all just there, the infinity of information for you to explore. Nothing is right or wrong, dangerous, or taboo. It is just another idea or perspective that exists.
It is from this place where change, growth and progress come. An honest look at reality, unclouded by perspective and judgement, is how you assess what is and isnāt working. We cannot evolve as a species until more people in power ascend above the dialectic to analyze what information can be used for the betterment of each humanās day to day life. A person above bias, judgement, trauma, lenses, perspective, influence, control, lobbying or pressure, unaffected by public opinion, is needed in any leadership role. It is rather immature to not be looking to evolve as a species past the monkey brain, the reactive, the controlled state. The thinking that emotions and feelings canāt be controlled and thus reality must be controlled to change them, is regressive. If people want to be truly free they must learn to master their animal brain and let go of one dimensional perspectives of life. The more the everyday person does this for themselves the sooner it will become apparent the need for this change in perspective for society, culture and politics as a whole. There will be more people able to hold leaders to these standards, and it will become increasingly apparent, that the narrative led mind and person is a thing of the past. Itās down to every single individual to free themselves of narratives imposed on them by their informational ecosphere. And the baptism by fire is right there in the palm of your hand. The way to step into the void is available to you 24/7. Itās a fast track to awakening to reality, and to feeling humble and grateful to be a human being getting to witness reality at this time. It is not a state to be scoffed upon. It is not a state of woo. It is not what I have heard it described as by anyone before. It just is. Its comfort, contentment, ease, understanding you will never understand, its playful and fun, its light. Nothing is so much better than distraction. Being calm and still mentally is not something that should be limited to yogis, and gurus. Itās every humanās birth right. Itās our REAL state of being. It is fundamentally human. Still the mind and you are free to explore reality in your body. To explore what is, not what you think it is. The mundane can be as beautiful as the sublime. There is no such thing as boredom in the void. You are there. Iād rather we as a species move towards enjoying existence because we are alive, rather than carry on as we are, thinking we are living because we are propping up our sick bodies and dysfunctional minds with narratives and leaning too heavily into perspective and individualism.
Now is the time. Grab this opportunity to jump down the rabbit hole. Itās really not that scary. The way things are going the rabbit hole will soon be lined with neon corporate signs and a foam pit to land in. So before itās too late, learn how to un-indoctrinate yourself. Everyone is wrong, everyone is right, everything can be good and it can also be bad. How can something hurt you that helps someone else? What if history was wrong? What if up was down? What if you drank the potion? What if you explored ideas, spaces and opinions that terrify you, and they turn out to change your world? What if you realized you can choose what lens or perspective to view anything with? What if you could have that level of control over yourself? What would the world be like if more people had the ability to see things from multiple perspectives and not hold any of those ideas tightly or defend them as āthe rightā way? How fast might things improve for your experience of the world and for society as a whole, if each person took responsibility for their perspective, addressed it as an entity to be understood and instead of being slave to it, was able to dance with it, and move it out the way when needed? What are you afraid of? Its only you there in the black mirror. Itās only your reactions that limit your access to information. Do you want to be scared of your shadow for the rest of your life, or do you want to be able to be truly free?
Today was amazing. Iām still buzzing about it. The Ye Alex Jones show was the best thing Iāve seen in years. Not cause of what was discussed, but cause it was the most radical punk rock art Iāve seen forā¦.decades?š¤·āāļø They just grabbed the world and shook it by its balls. Shaking people by the collar, desperately trying to get people to see what we have got ourselves into and how far we have already given up our freedom, rights, artistic license and sense of fun and play. This used to be a normal sight in the mainstream. An outrageous counter culture was vital to the mainstream and for keeping power in check. Now there is no counter culture. It canāt exist on the internet. You can’t be too messy, push boundaries or act out of the norm in the corporate mall that is the internet today. You can loose your right to access the space and also loose your right to work, money, education and relationships in the real world, if you piss off someone who doesn’t agree or is too ignorant to see, online. And when counter culture ideas go viral, it destroys society. You only need to look at 3rd wave feminism and the LGBTQWERTY crowd to see that what works for a few is not right for the many. The lack of a counter cultural space, means the President of the United States reacts and makes a public statement about an internet TV show bit. Ye wins. He pulls the strings. The structure of power, or lack of, was revealed. There is no non political space in our communal culture. But we aren’t politicians. And neither is Ye. Why should the world react to shut someone down and condemn them, for something they said? Why does it matter? The only people who need their speech policing are politicians and leaders. They should have their feet held to the fire over ever word. But you and me? Who cares? Why should we have to be living up to these corporate standards in our social spaces? What are they scared of us saying?
Today was pure performance art. I could be projecting. Cause itās exactly what I would have done if I was him. But it was exquisite. I was applauding and laughing and cheering them on. It was like a fucking ballet. In anti establishment performance art. The Mona Lisa of internet art. The new ācultureā. Culture Jamming. It made me feel alive. Itās just a few men talking on the internet. And the world has lost its mind. Alex Jones is already being sued for trillions and Ye has lost billions. They havenāt assaulted a single person. They havenāt stolen. Or killed. Or raped. They just talked on the internet.
And boyyyyy did they talk. They said some truly outrageous shit. But also. It was tame. The cruel and viscous words said and written at the end of relationships cause infinitely more harm than any words said yesterday. Who, specifically, was harmed? Everyoneās sensibilities were shocked. But none of the speech caused anyone direct harm and was not intended to do so. If you can be offended by an opinion that you donāt believe, even if that is about a characteristic you hold, then you arenāt very secure in your own beliefs. Itās a good opportunity to examine why it hurts, what triggers what emotion in you, and why. The same effect is being had by the event yesterday on the social conversation as a whole. Why are we doing things the way we are? Why are there actually unmentionables? Why is the world reacting to that and not allll the other issues going on? Why are we not trying to awaken? What are our values? Why do we not want to be Christ like? Who is controlling the information, opinions, services and culture that shapes up? Is letting emotion get in the way of seeing everything actually helpful for authentic enquiry and future growth? All of these question, Ye brought up, in many ways, over the 3 hours. He performed these questions as well as posing them. He didnāt shy away from explaining what he was doing. There intentions are stated. Itās all there if you want to watch.
I am not saying the whole thing was controlled and organized. But it was an intentional performance. You have an intention, a concept to convey, and you embody it in the moment. You donāt have limits or a script. You are speaking the truth, but not believing it. You are being authentic but with intention. You are letting yourself go, but in a specific direction. The performance artist is director and star. What they do and how they do it is all intentional. Even if its natural. I have spent 12 years saying things I shouldnāt say, live on the internet. I have been operating in the only relatively Wild West part of the internet left, the porn space. I have been a live webcam woman on a variety of sites over the years. And my favorite thing to do, is to say things youāre not supposed to say. Itās a pure adrenaline rush. Iām sat in my bedroom alone. Talking to a camera. Reading text on a screen. I have no idea who, or how many people are watchingā¦.are listening. And I just canāt help myself. Someone asks a question, something basic and I have to say it. Someone says something I can use, I never shy away from stating what I see.
I see this spiraling push from Ye. Telling someone like that no, over something illogical and arbitrary, is like a red rag to a bull. They have to say it. It becomes an obsession. The more rules imposed, the more you wanna say fuck you. Until yesterday I couldn’t care less about Kanye West. I don’t like rap, I don’t like his fashion, I don’t like the Kardashians. But yesterday helped me see him in a holistic way. I read the whole of YeS career like Andy Warhol. He isnāt a rapper who then did fashion. He is a artist. He is the art. Each piece is a valid piece in its own right, but the whole thing is a body of work, a creative narrative. He isnāt a normal person. Everything is intentional. Marrying Kim Kardaahian. A part of that was an artistic decision. He had to marry the most famous woman in the world. I relate, I had to marry someone I met one night in Vegas. Itās part of the arc, the bigger picture, the lifeās work. Itās an intentional sculpting and control over oneās life. Living as ones self while simultaneously aware of yourself being your life’s work. He isnāt just a person. And he cannot be read as such.
Iāve had dinner, drinks, sex or worked with people from every walk of life, a terrifying array. But I havenāt ever heard anything that has shocked me or made me want to shame the person speaking. I have had so many people tell me their secrets. I havenāt ever been offended by anyone elseās story, perspective or opinions. I am an observer. I am just there, able to see and hear others without my own perspective getting in the way in the moment. Ye is a observer. He is naturally aware of patterns in people and things and thus able to be ahead of his time, predicting or directing future trends. You cannot allow things like judgements of others getting in the way of how you experience other people and the world. You canāt properly observe the world otherwise. Itās an elevated state of being. It is a fundamental foundation stone when embodying love. He was trying to demonstrate it.
But. There is something of the early David Ike about this whole latest expression of Ye. There is something of the newly converted about his insistence on love and desire to shout his revelations from the roof top. He has seen it and can touch it, but it isnāt true yet. Itās so exciting when you first break through and realize things can be different. A shift in perspective, an elevation of understanding. That excitement and revelation turns you into a corner street preacher. Ye isn’t a classically trained academic. He hasn’t formally studied or learnt to write about the complex issues, opinions and experiences he has, from a completely unique life. But he has had a completely unique life, and sees the world in a way others don’t. He may not be the most intellectually through. But his instinct and way of seeing the world allows him to see the things without needing the fancy words to say it. I know how that feels. Itās incredibly hard for me to form my thoughts into sentences rather than the immersive experience of my understanding of the world in my head. The need for performance and alternative means of communicating ideas has thus been the medium Ye works in. He doesn’t need to form articulate essays, or be a good politician, he embodies his ideas, he pursues creative projects he aligns with. His ultimate skill is distilling complex ideas down into songs that resonate around the world. If he is rambling and inarticulate on a podcast, then the content of his words isn’t the point, it is the piece as a whole that should be judged accordingly. You cannot hold a artist to the standards of a politician or a journalist or a academic. Its a completely different language of communication. And to demonize people over their ability to use the “right” langue and tone seems incredibly elitist, snobby and intentionally missing their point.
Using langue as a way of controlling people and what they are allowed to say has exploded in internet age, however 50% of the population of America have the reading and writing comprehension of a 13-14 year old. Is it at all surprising the level of discourse is that of a high school playground? Considering how ill equipped the masses are for handling the infinity of information on the internet, a considerable amount of individual and collective power has been ceded here. Our social focus has been shifted into these corporate spaces that set out the rules we can play by, and we are expected to fill the role of politician, advocate and corporate drone. Part of the reading of yesterday was Ye highlighting how much more Power and attention there is on the internet than in reality. Real life should matter. The internet should mirror life not shape reality. Itās not real. It isnāt a place. Itās power and importance needs exploding and reassessing. Ye seems to want to be that bomb. He sees the need for it. And with what he has already lost, he is willing to smash what he can in the process. “I love Hitler”….and then what? What happened? Nothing. He has already been cancel and had his money taken away, there is nothing else they can do to him. He is showing us where we can end up if we keep placing this weight and value in internet speech. Why does it matter more than real life? Words in the ether over evils in reality? We are choosing democratically as a society to give our attention to this electrical ether, the internet. We are accepting a reality that would never have happened before our priorities shifted to online society. Massive news items of the corruption in politics and corporations, the wreck the real lives of everyday people, are overlooked for a few word a man said on a screen. The trafficking of children, the homicide in the black community, the fentanyl crisis, the housing crisis, the failures of the pandemic, all of gets no attention, compared to the latest viral moment. We are being controlled online so we accept the unacceptable crimes happening to people in reality. We don’t improve our own lives. Reality takes a back seat to online life and fantasy. Limiting the concept of intellectual freedom by policing language online, starts to slowly shrink the size of the box we are playing in. Shrinking our worlds conceptually, shrinks what we think is possible in reality.
Here I am going to add, he does have a real bee in his bonnet about the Jews. The content of his speech and his performance as an artist can not really be separated from him and his experience of reality. He is going through a hard time and he has a entirely unique life. No one can comprehend the perspective he is viewing the world from, or what he has seen, done and been through. If he has had lots of bad experiences with people in power that he thinks are Jewish, then to him, Jewish people are fucking him over. If lots of the people in power in the media, Hollywood, fashion and porn industries are Jewish, then it may seem like they are influencing culture. Stating the fact that there are powerful Jews does not mean there is a satanic cabal of Jewish peaophines running the world, or that you want your Jewish neighbor Janet to be shipped off to concentration camps. When you understand cronyism, and the mantra its not what you know, its who you know, the concentration of ethnicities in certain fields makes sense. If you want to twist that to be a intentional conspiracy cause you have been personally harmed by this group, go ahead. That’s your perspective. But blaming others for your situation is never the way to solve your problems. Ye is currently being attacked from all sides and is undoubtedly in fight or flight mode. In this state the brain isn’t functioning clearly enough to act from a place of wisdom and personal responsibility. And that is ok. His trauma and baggage and prejudice and blind spots being present in the art sparks more questions. for the viewer. And in the end, he just said some crazy shit on the internet. He is only really hurting himself.
He knows this, but the whole world and politicians on all sides, will react to a man in a mask waving a net and bottle of Yoo-hoo doing silly voices. A point this performance seemed to be making, is already proven. If no one took it seriously, it wouldnāt matter. If the audience, commentators, media and politicians didnāt mention it, or instead laughed at it, or talked about it as show or a skit, then it would have no power. People are offended cause they are told to be. Tell them itās art. Tell them itās ridiculous, laugh. Art is subjective. You can think itās poorly executed but I donāt think you can take clips and judge content, as political commentary, or a statement on his views, without viewing the whole piece. By being clipped and taken seriously as independent statements with an effect in the real world, the art has become the thing he was trying to highlight was happening. The President of the United States responded. You can think āoh he isn’t that smartā, but letās remember he is the man whose ideas made him a, now ex, billionaire. He is an artist who has been so successful he has lost billions and still has enough fuck you money to keep going on his artistic journey.
To me, today was a big screaming, crazy, hooded, middle finger to the weight, limitations and hypocrisy everyone feels, in todays culture and being online. He exploded the shrinking box of creative expression that has been allowed to exist in the public sphere, even if just for this news cycle. He showed a glimpse of something we have forgotten. That it doesnāt fkin matter. Not everything on the internet is life and death, proclamation set in stone. He is a fkin rapper and he was having creative fun. They all were being naughty. Pushing buttons they knew they shouldn’t, with a snicker and a grin….and the whole world jumped…just as expected. It was a great show and now the media and the masses are performing their roles in the second act. I may be projecting with this whole reading. He may just as plausibly have done it for many different reasons, from a mental health issue to it being an establishment psy-op. I have no skin in the game. I’m not a fan of Ye. This isn’t a defence of Ye. I am a fan of art and freedom of expression and pushing intellectual boundaries. And this is the reading I see from my perspective as a fellow performance artist, and person treading their own unique intentional path . I applaud Ye for the freedom he has reminded me is possible, intellectually and creatively and the added bonus of endowing ability to see who is a intellectual NPC.